Talk:Oh Dreams!: Difference between revisions
From Fanon Wiki
m (Text replacement - "User:Wraith/sig2" to "User:Wraith/sig") |
m (Text replacement - "{{User:Wraith/sig}}" to "{{User:Zoadra/sig}}") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't see the reason to delete this page. It's content that is covered by our coverage policy, under OC. {{User: | I don't see the reason to delete this page. It's content that is covered by our coverage policy, under OC. {{User:Zoadra/sig}} 20:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC) | ||
:How related does OC here have to be to an existing media franchise though? After a certain point it's more like making canon for something you created. It could be considered fanon of fanon, but that seems a little bit like a stretch (also the [[Fanon Wiki:scope policy|scope policy]] is still technically considered a draft). {{User:PinkYoshiFan/sig}} 11:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC) | :How related does OC here have to be to an existing media franchise though? After a certain point it's more like making canon for something you created. It could be considered fanon of fanon, but that seems a little bit like a stretch (also the [[Fanon Wiki:scope policy|scope policy]] is still technically considered a draft). {{User:PinkYoshiFan/sig}} 11:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC) | ||
::Well, I remember talking at length about allowing for OC content, So this would fall under OC:. That coverage policy seems to have either been made before it was decided to allow OC, or Soprano was in error. Either way, the prevailing attitude I think we should have is a generous policy on allowing a myriad of content, so we don't turn away potential editors. {{User: | ::Well, I remember talking at length about allowing for OC content, So this would fall under OC:. That coverage policy seems to have either been made before it was decided to allow OC, or Soprano was in error. Either way, the prevailing attitude I think we should have is a generous policy on allowing a myriad of content, so we don't turn away potential editors. {{User:Zoadra/sig}} 21:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:48, 8 November 2023
I don't see the reason to delete this page. It's content that is covered by our coverage policy, under OC. Zoadra 
Admin, Bureaucrat, Founder 20:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- How related does OC here have to be to an existing media franchise though? After a certain point it's more like making canon for something you created. It could be considered fanon of fanon, but that seems a little bit like a stretch (also the scope policy is still technically considered a draft).
PinkYoshiFan 11:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I remember talking at length about allowing for OC content, So this would fall under OC:. That coverage policy seems to have either been made before it was decided to allow OC, or Soprano was in error. Either way, the prevailing attitude I think we should have is a generous policy on allowing a myriad of content, so we don't turn away potential editors. Zoadra Admin, Bureaucrat, Founder 21:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I remember talking at length about allowing for OC content, So this would fall under OC:. That coverage policy seems to have either been made before it was decided to allow OC, or Soprano was in error. Either way, the prevailing attitude I think we should have is a generous policy on allowing a myriad of content, so we don't turn away potential editors. Zoadra